| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
21. Any skin on any ship - bug on SiSi - yes we could have skins on ship... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Darwin wrote: Rain6637 wrote: Even if you plan to release everything and are making an effort to do so, the pricing is... obnoxious. OK, so why don't you give specific feedback. What do you want to see, and what price is the most you'd...
- by Burl en Daire - at 2015.05.04 11:55:52
|
22. Bad Advice Thread - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hull tanking is for noobs.
- by Burl en Daire - at 2015.05.02 22:25:12
|
23. Im declaring war on Null ...whos in!? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Chewytowel Haklar wrote: Vector Symian wrote: Chewytowel Haklar wrote: All I see is spreadsheets every time I undock. I suppose I could declare war on their spreadsheets with my spreadsheets and we could even hire an accountant to boost o...
- by Burl en Daire - at 2015.04.01 02:29:50
|
24. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sgt Ocker wrote: You want to reduce someones indices, just have a few cloaky campers online around the clock. No mining, no ratting = No indices. So simple, So exploitable. No effective counter. The effective counter is to not dock up. Bei...
- by Burl en Daire - at 2015.03.26 23:14:23
|
25. Sticky:[New structures] Market hubs and drilling platforms - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Querns wrote: The idea of "passive" mining structures is very intriguing. Will drilling platforms be able to be parked in an asteroid belt (or even a mining anomaly) and be able to mine autonomously, or will doing so require human interaction t...
- by Burl en Daire - at 2015.03.23 21:42:26
|
26. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: Null anom income is good but anoms (which should have never been press-ganged into being the center of the Dominion systems upgrades scheme) are predictable , soloable and semi-afkable. That means you end up with people afk ra...
- by Burl en Daire - at 2015.03.16 21:51:22
|
27. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Borachon wrote: Burl en Daire wrote: What do you think the optimal number of IHubs would be for a system and/or what would you base that number off of? What would be an appropriate size (m3) and cost? Good question, and I'm not sure a...
- by Burl en Daire - at 2015.03.11 06:56:58
|
28. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Wanda Fayne wrote: Burl en Daire wrote: Wanda Fayne wrote: I like the fuel idea, but it will die with the other good ideas... Now lets cut to the chase: As a revolutionary idea, lets put the meat on the table and require the entosis...
- by Burl en Daire - at 2015.03.11 06:50:35
|
29. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Have the corporation declare one held system the capital system. The capital system would declare the prime time and once the capital system moves to level two any system connected to it by a gate could be taken and upgraded to level one. Each lev...
- by Burl en Daire - at 2015.03.11 06:14:43
|
30. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Wanda Fayne wrote: SilentAsTheGrave wrote: Just reposting what seems to have gained some traction in case it was lost in the pages: In regards to the Entosis Link using fuel: I think this is a good idea. Using one Strontium every time yo...
- by Burl en Daire - at 2015.03.11 04:38:09
|
31. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Borachon wrote: Mike Azariah wrote: On the other hand I do not like the concept of people not bothering with territorial control hubs because they are too easily blown up. The math one person put up was well presented and worth looking at ....
- by Burl en Daire - at 2015.03.11 04:30:52
|
32. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Alavaria Fera wrote: Burl en Daire wrote: Yroc Jannseen wrote: I think most of the CFC have a pretty good idea what we are going to do with these changes. I look forward to watching things burn for a while but we shouldn't forget that ...
- by Burl en Daire - at 2015.03.11 00:48:03
|
33. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Yroc Jannseen wrote: Burl en Daire wrote: Alavaria Fera wrote: Primary This Rifter wrote: Mike Azariah wrote: It is hard to imagine this being playtested on Sisi because so much of it WILL be psyops. So we can theroycraft and postur...
- by Burl en Daire - at 2015.03.11 00:42:46
|
34. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Alavaria Fera wrote: Primary This Rifter wrote: Mike Azariah wrote: It is hard to imagine this being playtested on Sisi because so much of it WILL be psyops. So we can theroycraft and posture all you want . . . it will be tested when the ...
- by Burl en Daire - at 2015.03.11 00:32:15
|
35. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Aralyn Cormallen wrote: Burl en Daire wrote: Kagura Nikon wrote: LOL. I DARE YOU to really convince 20 thousand players to do that all the time. At least fro more than 1 month. I have said the same thing but it is GSF and they have all...
- by Burl en Daire - at 2015.03.06 12:14:15
|
36. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
davet517 wrote: Damned if I'm going to read 150 pages. Has anyone addressed how caps and supers will play into all of this yet? I know you can make a theoretical argument that every serious fight will escalate, but I don't see a necessary escal...
- by Burl en Daire - at 2015.03.06 11:45:02
|
37. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Kagura Nikon wrote: LOL. I DARE YOU to really convince 20 thousand players to do that all the time. At least fro more than 1 month. I have said the same thing but it is GSF and they have all the everything. I agree that they can muster up a ...
- by Burl en Daire - at 2015.03.06 11:36:46
|
38. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Seraph IX Basarab wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Burl en Daire wrote: What else is there? Don't even try a false dichotomy. There are more alternatives to sov warfare than grinding structures endlessly an...
- by Burl en Daire - at 2015.03.06 07:44:57
|
39. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sibyyl wrote: Mike Azariah wrote: oh and some stats for you, make of them what you will Apparently CODEdot is all worked up about SOV. Did this beat the JF thread?
- by Burl en Daire - at 2015.03.06 07:05:07
|
40. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Burl en Daire wrote: [ Yes, but if you aren't willing to put in the work to hold the space then move to HS or LS. Null sec should be work just like WH should be work. And, according to you, sitting on a structure...
- by Burl en Daire - at 2015.03.06 06:59:48
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |